search instagram arrow-down
Unknown's avatar
Charles Johnston

Recent Posts

Blog Stats

Follow Now That I'm Catholic on WordPress.com

Now That I’m Catholic Facebook

Translate

Top Posts & Pages

Past articles

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 19.3K other subscribers

Follow me on Twitter

The Bible In A Year: Day 233

Readings:
2 Chronicles 20
Sirach 24
1 Corinthians 7

1 Corinthians 7

Paul is now addressing another question that was posed to him in the letter from the Corinthians. This question is concerning marriage ne celibacy. Paul tells them that it would be better to remain single, but that the vocation of celibacy for the kingdom isn’t a vocation for everyone. Due to human nature, concupiscence and the temptation of the world around us, it’s better for most to pursue the vocation of marriage instead.

Both are callings, and as such, both are not meant for everyone. Some people aren’t cut out for one of the other, so to prevent headaches and sinful situations, both should be discerned before committing to one. Nothing that is called by God should be taken lightly or assumed, it should be prayed about and discerned with a spiritual adviser to make sure you are going into the right vocation for you.

But although marriage is a beautiful thing, and the church definitely needs married couples, Paul is explicitly clear that the single state is prefered. This isn’t just about the priesthood either. Any married person can tell you that there’s a lot of commitment and responsibilities that goes along with it, so much that it’s not possible to be totally committed to missionary or evangelical endeavors as much as a single person would be, or to any other occupation or vocation. And because evangelization is the highest calling, and the direct command of Our Lord to all believers just before his ascension, it is what should be occupying the majority of the time of church ministry and function. Since the church is made up of a collective of people, that means we need people wholly dedicated to these and other functions, and that’s not as doable for married people as it is singles. It’s just a fact of time management, but also a fact of commitment and vocation too.

Although he says the single state is superior, he also tells them to remain and flourish in whatever state God has called them in. Basically don’t abandon your spouse to become a monk. It’s counterproductive, it’s wrong, and we’re not all called to the single life. We can’t get upset and worried over circumstances that are beyond our control.

Paul compares this to people who were circumcised as Jews and then became Christians. Although circumcision is no longer necessary in the new covenant, Paul says they shouldn’t try to reverse this now and become uncircumcised. Which itself wouldn’t be possible to do, so he’s using a bit of hyperbole here. The lesson ultimately is to flourish where you find yourself, and not try to change unchangeable things. Work on what you can change.

Paul also makes clear that if someone does chose to get married then he commits no sin in doing so. This was to refute the teachings of some that denounced either marriage or the marital act. Probably a local strain of Gnosticism.

Tomorrow’s Readings:
2 Chronicles 21-22
Sirach 25
1 Corinthians 8-9

2 comments on “The Bible In A Year: Day 233

  1. John-Otto Liljenstolpe's avatar John-Otto Liljenstolpe says:

    Now if the Catholic Church would only come to understand that some men are called to celebacy and some men are called to pastoral ministry; and while there are men who are called to both, some are called to one but not the other. The doctrine that all priests must live as celibates has caused a great deal of suffering and trajedy not only for priests but also the rest of the Church.

    Like

    1. The western church has a tradition of celibate priests, but the eastern church does not. And both have been having shortages in priestly vocations, so I don’t think one leads to the other. Also there are many ways to serve in the church out of the priesthood, but if a man feels called to that then it’s the sacrifice they have to make to be wholly committed to it.
      I’ve actually met and talked with a few married priests and they’ve all told me that it’s a struggle and the couldn’t commit to the same on-call status that a pastor of a large parish does. That’s why married priests in the west are almost always parochial vicars and not pastors, and in the eastern Catholic Churches their parishes tend to be a quarter of the size of western rite ones (conversations were all US based so I can’t really comment on the situation outside of the states)

      Like

Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *